Good evening all, and apologies for a lack of recent updates.
If you have not had a chance to listen to Ashley Walsh on ABC radio recently, you probably would not have heard his interview with the Acting Manager of the Drugs of Dependence Unit (DDU), Mr Colin Brown. The interview was held on 2nd August 2011. The interview has really struck a nerve with those who have listened, and it has taken some time to formulate an appropriate response.
If you get a chance, listen to the interview and consider our rebuttal as follows:
The first statement, that the DDU liaises with the treating doctor, is false. The process that the treating doctor must follow is to fill out a form and then send it to the DDU for an authority to prescribe the medication. The response is an acceptance or rejection, again in writing. It should be noted that the treating doctor has already “arrived” at the appropriate dose that the doctor themselves deems appropriate and therefore applies for that level of authority to prescribe. Any reduction is a unilateral decision made by the DDU as our cases have described to date.
Secondly, the third statement made is that the review is conducted with the patient and/or the treating doctor – which is also false. It is only in the case of the treating doctor being a DASSA (Drug & Alcohol Services of South Australia) employee that there is there any written submission.
It should be noted that in the case where a treating doctor is a DASSA employee that their aim is to reduce all medication to zero as they are drug and alcohol abuse doctors. These doctors know little about pain and the fact their patients are in pain appears to be of no concern to them at all. They continue to hide behind the “hyper-algesia” theory which states that the more analgesia patients have, the worse their pain appears to be. That being the case, when medications are reduced, the pain should also subside. However this is not the case and as we’ve seen, the pain of patients continues to rise.
In fact, some of the world’s leading experts in pain management claim that “hyper-algesia” is extremely rare in humans.
The Acting Manager claimed that on average, around 7,500 patients receive drugs of dependence and that 95% of those cases responded to alternative therapies agreed to by the patient and treating doctor. He claims that 5% do not. This is approximately 375 patients. Alarmingly, this is close to the amount of cases that have submitted their stories to us here at the DFPS.
Another statement made is that there is an avenue of appeal for patients. This is also incorrect as the HCSCC only examine the process in place to ensure that the process has been followed. Now if the process is incorrect (as we contest it is) then a review of a bad process that is being followed will always pass any test given. This state has a designated ‘limit’ of “pain relief” per day and firmly believe that no patient should be above it because of the “hyper-algesia” theory. Nor do they believe that such medications be given long term.
Now, the Acting Manager also refers to these so called panel of experts as “Senior Pharmacists” who oversee the DDU process. We question why this is the case when pharmacists are by no means suited to fill the role of a treating doctor. Whilst these so called “experts” argue the dosage and length of time that patients should obtain such treatments, South Australians are being left to suffer. We have laws in South Australia to protect suffering animals, but no such laws for human beings.
These people only want to live their life with some modicum of dignity.
You can listen to the interview here: download